Galileo on religion and science Essay

Explain Galileos begin to remove scholarship and devotion congenial, with particular reference to methods of on the dotification. How successful is he? Use Kuhns nonion of incommensurability to enquire Galileos effort to reconcile the propositions of comprehension and theology.There pass on always be a battle between worship and attainment, it is a impartiality universally acknowledged. Galileo move to make the two compatible by suggesting that the verity lav l unrivalled(prenominal) be sought kayoed if the nonion to a lower place consideration shadower be accurately tested and if the opposing view can be set in moti bingled as false. Galileos goes into wisdom ab bulge out the accuracy of volume and the sciences, intertwined with the condition of man, in his letter to Christina of Lorraine, Grand Duchess of Tuscany. introductory(predicate) on in the letter Galileo, infers from St Augustine that the dedicated Ghost did not intend to memorize how nirvan a goes rather how one goes to heaven. Galileo interprets this as the underlying tail end for the super C pot to guess that man should not concern themselves with science and that it is a createst the word of honor, and therefore blasphemous. what is more this misconception is continued, as Galileo believes that the frequent people commiserate the truth in the give-and-take is for the most part to do with ones repurchase and different material things such as whether the solarise or Earth be mobile, are irrelevant.From this Galileo leads on to discuss that forcible problems are fit to be cypher through sense-experiences and priming coat, as come up as the authority of scriptural passages highlighting that all are reasonable to contain the truth. Galileo argues that deity gifted man with the power of reason and logic, so that they would be able to chance and learn about his creation. theology did not set bounds to human politeness so why should the church levy them, by discrediting and prohibiting some of the greatest work of philosophers and scientists? Galileo had two types of physical propositions those that are able to be subjected to tests and experiments and those that can only be conjectured about and these are best odd to confidence and holy place sacred scriptures. Galileo did not believe that everything in the universe was known to man, he believed that there were more truths to be discovered. He did not agree that free-philosophizing should be shunned, because the holy Ghost states that man cannot find out the work that God hath done from starting line even toend.Galileo is not fulfill by this and urges others to not side with the general opinion of the scriptures, to the shoot for where it blocks logic and reason, and at long last truth. He highlights this by using the Sun and the Earth the debate about the equable Sun and the mobile Earth, as numerous come to believe it was most wild to believe otherwise. T his is because Nicholas Copernicus provided prove for his claims which were reasonable and logical that it was plain as sidereal day. Galileo stresses the importance of not bending the parole of God to fulfil ones foolish fancies i.e. one should guard themselves a recognisest deliberately misinterpreting the Holy script to suit their own end. The repetition of this (citing scripture to back up their skewed claims) result lead to the inevitable adoption of this reason and consequently missing the genuine baseborn behind the scriptural passages. This is what Galileo means when he refers to as the vulgar and common people, sometimes misinterpret the holy writings of the script to fulfil their foolish fancies.Because of this Galileo advocates the importance for gentlemans gentleman to step away from information that just concerns salvation and to broaden their horizons most importantly, to not be afraid of the truth. By this he suggests that Holy Scripture and explanations of physical things come their own place in the cosmos and that man should keep an open judicial decision to explore twain, because both are valid sources of the truth. He goes on to say that God did not intend for his Word to be misinterpreted like this and the true meaning to be obscured, and this sort of abuse should not gain countenance and authority.However as Galileo stated it is more pleasant to gain a reputation for wisdom without experiments and look for than it is to pursue science and produce evidence for these physical observations. Galileo is thankful to God because he does not allow the majority of these common folk as stated above to have all the authority, some lettered people too have authority. Galileo is not speaking blasphemy, he is suggesting there is a place for both Holy philosophy as well as scientific doctrine and he attempts to prove this.Galileo is come to with obtaining the truth about the world we bang in, whether religion provides an answer or sci ence. This is observable in the letter when he is discussing the aery bodies concerning the work of Copernicus. Galileo believes that it would be wholly wild to banCopernicus work after it has been substantiate over the years, he puts it in my thinker to be a contravention of the truth if this were to occur. Basically Galileo believes if something is true, the basis of the truth either, ghostly or scientific is equally creditable. He further states that if scientific fact is unattainable, it moldiness be a thing of faith and religion where human think cannot have-to doe with and there is no science notwithstanding only opinion of faith the truth must(prenominal) be in the Scripture. This is exhibit in the letter whether the stars are breathe in or whether or not the welkin are spherical. Galileo believes that ultimately that the science behind a phenomena will oppose to the Scripture that describes it the true senses of the Bible will most certainly be found to agree w ith the proven fact.He further goes on to admit, that at number 1 the two whitethorn seem all in all different and closer scrutiny is required. Galileo proves his point further by stating that two truths can never contradict each other ultimately, the spectral and scientific, must both be compatible for something to be proven true. The social occasion of Galileos success is dependent largely on his era and the audience. Being a follower of God as well as a man of science and a philosopher, Galileo had to come to scathe with both his beliefs and what his physical senses and reasoning told him about the world. He achieved this by describing that the facts produced by reasoning will equal the truth held in the Scripture both religion and science were correct. However, this was conditional the Holy Scripture should not be misinterpreted and the notion under consideration should be tested through logic. Following this Galileo, believed that the perceptiveness held by an individual of the Holy Scripture, generally relied upon how leaned such a person was and their dexterity to realize the true meaning of the biblical passages.Primarily Galileo could not disregard the Bible wholly firstly, as mentioned above he himself believed greatly in God and second the people of the time were immersed in the religion from infancy it was to them, common knowledge and the truth about the world. Given this Galileo had to find a solution to please both religious beliefs whilst allowing scientific inquiry and philosophising to occur. As he describe the vulgar and common people may shun his persuasions, because they do not accept anything that is not Holy Scripture, and believe Galileo and other scientists and philosophers to be blasphemous. However Galileo attempts tomake sense of this by discussing that perhaps they misinterpreted the Bible and consequently the true meaning (which is compatible with science) is lost to them, that it is beyond their capacity to comprehend. It is remarked by Galileo people who are unable to comprehend both the Bible and the sciences far number those who do understand perhaps this is Galileo commenting on his own success that he is only able to reach people if they understand the true meaning of Scripture and are capable of understanding the sciences.Galileo in his attempt to reconcile the propositions of both religion and science, it is lucid that he employed Kuhns measures of gross(a) incommensurability. The evidence acquired via observation is an insufficient basis for theory comparison, due to the inherent idea that perceptual experience is theory dependant. Basically, ones ability to develop a theory is base on their previous life experiences whether it be from actual physical events, emotional or spiritual events. each(prenominal) play a role in the development of a theory, which is formed based on how an individual sees the world and what they conclude about it. This in mind, it can be observed that Galil eos religious rearing and his adulthood, greatly influenced his views on religion and science.Galileo believed that Holy Scripture and the sciences were compatible it can be inferred from his letter (as previously discussed) that when human reasoning is unable to provide an answer than it must be left to faith. Extrapolating on this one may conclude that Galileo could be suggesting that the true meaning of science was written in the Bible and God gifted serviceman with the power to reason, to ultimately find out the truth of the world, of creation. It is this notion that people may find it hard to come to terms with because, it was believed that God did not want adult male to discover the truth. However, Galileo questioned (as did many others) why consequently did God bestow reason and logic on humans? This ultimately drives Galileo in his quest to make religion and science compatible. This reflects the perpetual incommensurability of Kuhn that ones ground will inevitably colou r their perception, as demonstrated by Galileos attempt to reconcile religious faith and the sciences. acknowledgement listAll in school text citations and all information about this raise were sourced from the following ATS2867, Thinking about wisdom Study guide and Readings, Monash University, 1998 15-3051-66.